Skip to content

Glencore digs deeper in Sudbury Basin

The future of Glencore's nickel operations in Sudbury will require deeper mines to access previously untapped deposits, said Marc Boissonneault, the company's vice-president of Sudbury nickel operations.
Glencore-Nickel_Cropped
Marc Boissonneault, Glencore's vice-president for its Sudbury nickel operations, said the company will need to develop deeper nickel deposits in the Sudbury Basin to remain productive in the region.

The future of Glencore's nickel operations in Sudbury will require deeper mines to access previously untapped deposits, said Marc Boissonneault, the company's vice-president of Sudbury nickel operations.

Boisonneault, who addressed the Greater Sudbury Chamber of Commerce on Oct. 21, said the mining giant is eyeing two potential Sudbury developments that would require mine shafts as deep as 2,700 metres.

The first project is Onaping Mine, a site that was discovered years ago, but contains ultra-deep deposits that could not be safely accessed until recently.

Glencore estimates the mine contains 15.7 million tonnes of nickel deposits at higher grades than average for the Sudbury Basin, and would require a capital expenditure of $547 million to develop.

The company is expected to complete a pre-feasibility study for the project later in the year, and will decide by the first or second quarter next year whether it would be worthwhile to mine the deep deposits.

“Given our life of mine situation, we would like to get started on it soon,” Boissonneault said.

Glencore's flagship mine in Sudbury, Nickel Rim, has a mine life that should extend until 2020, he said.

Glencore is currently exploring a second deposit near Nickel Rim - about 1,000 metres deeper than the current mine - which extends to around 1,700 metres underground.

“We see it as the likely future of Nickel Rim,” Boissonneault said.

If the deposit proves to be feasible, along with Onaping, it could extend Glencore's Sudbury nickel production until the mid-2030s.

At 2,700 metres, both projects would qualify as ultra-deep mines, and would pose a number of technical challenges.

“Deep mining will require geo-technical management that is a lot more modern,” Boissonneault said. “Geo-technically, what happens is that the stress increases at depth.”

One challenge is cooling mine shafts at those depths, which get warmer with every added metre underground.

Boissonneault said Glencore has explored using cold lake water to cool the mines, instead of the more expensive refrigeration systems used in a typical mine.

Parts of Toronto draw in cool water from Lake Ontario to cool buildings near the waterfront. Boissonneault said Glencore could use a similar system for Onaping and Nickel Rim.

In January, the Sudbury-based Centre for Excellence in Mining Innovation (CEMI) received a $15-million grant from the federal government's Business-led Networks of Centres of Excellence program to pursue research to make ultra-deep mining — deeper than 2.5 kilometres or roughly 8,000 feet — more efficient and productive.

CEMI's research in ventilation technologies and reducing rock stress is expected to make projects like Glencore's Onaping Mine and Nickel Rim extension more feasible.

“The ventilation cost is the single largest cost for any underground mine,” said Douglas Morrison, CEMI's president and CEO. “And to make that single cost larger has a very large impact on the overall viability of the mine.”

Mines are typically cooled through a natural heat exchange system – where air is cooled down at surface and pumped underground.

Because the air heats up as it is pumped deeper underground – the system is no longer effective beyond the 2.5-km point.

At that depth and beyond, mines need to introduce expensive systems to cool the air underground.

CEMI-funded researchers have already started to take cues from the past to develop more efficient systems for underground cooling.

“We're actually going back in time, and we're beginning to look at techniques that were used way back in the 1900s, before there was grid power and before there was ready access to fossil fuels,” Morrison said.

One such system was developed in Cobalt at the turn of the 20th century.

The ragged chutes technique, as it was called, used a small waterfall to produce compressed air that supplied oxygen to the area's mines.

Morrison said combining 100-year-old techniques with new technologies could lead to advancements in underground ventilation.

Using cold lake water to cool a deep mine could get around current ventilation limitations.

CEMI is also exploring new techniques to support underground tunnels, which will help make mines safer, and more productive as they go deeper.

www.glencore.com