Skip to content

Injury at Timmins open pit nets fine for Toronto industrial supplier

Harnessed worker dragged by truck at Hollinger Pit in 2017 incident
0
2017_April25_HollingerOP_NortheastViewby ComfortInn

Orica Canada, a Toronto mining services company, was fined $65,000 in a Timmins court stemming from a 2017 incident at Goldcorp’s Hollinger Pit where a worker was seriously injured after being dragged by a moving vehicle.

The company entered a guilty plea for failing as an employer to provide the necessary information, instruction and supervision to a worker under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and convicted on June 28 by Justice of the Peace Sylvie-Emanuelle Bourbonnais.

The customary 25 per cent victim fine surcharge was tacked to bring the total fine to $81,250.

According to the account provided by the Ministry of Labour, on March 20, 2017 a worker was assigned the task of taping holes at the pit.

That process involved measuring the length of drilled holes and reporting the measurements by radio to a co-worker to record the measurements.

That area of the pit was considered a restricted zone. This meant that, owing to previous underground work in the area, there was a risk of ground instability.

The procedure for working in a restricted zone was to wear a body harness for fall protection and to be tethered to a vehicle parked near the pit.

If the fall protection equipment used did not involve a self-retracting line, a spotter was required to watch over the worker in the restricted zone and to keep the tethering line taut.

In addition, the vehicle serving as the anchor was to be turned off and a master switch locked out; or, if there was no master switch on the vehicle, it was to be locked and the keys were to be in the possession of the worker tied off to the vehicle.

On the day of the incident, a Goldcorp worker was acting as spotter, and it was this person's truck being used as the fall protection anchor.

Around 11 a.m. that worker left the area with the truck in order to take other workers to go for lunch.

The Orica supervisor arrived at the pit as the spotter left the area, parking his truck facing the pit, and engaged in a cell phone call with another supervisor.

The worker performing the taping and measuring approached this truck and indicated there were further holes to tape, and wanted to be tied off to this vehicle.

The supervisor on the other end of the call heard the truck owner/supervisor give permission to do so and also heard a suggestion that the worker could take a break.

The co-worker recording the measurements arrived shortly after this and pulled his truck parallel to that of the Orica supervisor's.

The co-worker was aware that the fall arrest equipment was clipped to the supervisor's truck, spoke briefly with the worker performing the measuring, and clipped the fall arrest equipment to his co-worker's harness.

Returning to the pit, the worker was anchored to the supervisor's vehicle.

There was no spotter, nor did the worker have the keys to the supervisor's truck.

A few minutes later, the supervisor finished the conversation with the other supervisor, put his vehicle in gear, and drove away.

The worker who was still tethered to the truck was pulled out of the pit and dragged behind the truck until becoming wedged under the second truck, and sustained critical injuries.